PKI Consortium blog
Posts by tag TLS 1.2
The CA Security Council Looks Ahead to 2020 and Beyond
January 9, 2020 by
Patrick Nohe
(GlobalSign),
Doug Beattie
(GlobalSign)
Apple
CA/Browser Forum
Chrome
Edge
Encryption
EV
Firefox
Forward Secrecy
GDPR
Google
Identity
Microsoft
Mozilla
PKI
Policy
Qualified
SSL 3.0
SSL/TLS
TLS 1.0
TLS 1.1
TLS 1.2
TLS 1.3
Web PKI
A whirlwind of activity will cause dramatic shifts across the PKI world in the year ahead Suffice it to say that 2019 was filled with challenges and contentiousness as Certificate Authorities and Browsers began to watch their shared visions diverge. The debate around Extended Validation continued as CAs pushed for a range of reforms and browsers pushed to strip its visual indicators. And a ballot to shorten maximum certificate validity periods exposed fault-lines at the CAB Forum.
CA Security Council (CASC) 2019 Predictions: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly
December 6, 2018 by
Bruce Morton
(Entrust),
Chris Bailey
(Entrust),
Jay Schiavo
(Entrust)
Apple
Attack
CASC
Chrome
DV
Encryption
EV
Firefox
Google
Identity
IETF
Malware
Microsoft
Phishing
SSL/TLS
TLS 1.0
TLS 1.2
TLS 1.3
As the legendary coach of the NY Yankees Yogi Berra allegedly said, “It’s difficult to make predictions, especially about the future.” But we’re going to try.
Here are the CA Security Council (CASC) 2019 Predictions: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly.
The Good Prediction: By the end of 2019, over 90% of the world’s http traffic will be secured over SSL/TLS
Encryption boosts user security and privacy, and the combined efforts of browsers and Certification Authorities (CAs) over the past few years have moved us rapidly to a world approaching 100% encryption.
TLS 1.3 Includes Improvements to Security and Performance
April 10, 2018 by
Tim Shirley
Forward Secrecy
IETF
SSL/TLS
TLS 1.2
TLS 1.3
Vulnerability
Last month saw the final adoption, after 4 years of work, of TLS version 1.3 by the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). This latest iteration of the protocol for secure communications on the internet boasts several noteworthy improvements to both security and performance:
Security All cipher suites that do not provide forward secrecy have been eliminated from TLS 1.3. This is a very important security property, because without forward secrecy, if a server’s private key is compromised today, any previously-recorded conversations with that server dating back as long as the key was in use could be decrypted.
2016 – Looking Back, Moving Forward
December 14, 2015 by
Bruce Morton
(Entrust)
Attack
CA/Browser Forum
CAA
Chrome
Code Signing
DH
Encryption
Firefox
Google
Hash Function
IETF
Microsoft
MITM
OpenSSL
Policy
RC4
Revocation
RSA
SSL/TLS
TLS 1.2
TLS 1.3
Vulnerability
Looking Back at 2015 A number of new tactics proved 2015 was no exception to an active year defending against ever increasing security issues. Vendors found new and creative ways to provide vulnerabilities including the now popular man-in-the-middle (MitM) attacks. MitM as well as a host of other new vulnerabilities caused browsers to rethink their security requirements. This article gives a flashback of the exploits and industry changes from 2015 and looks ahead at the latest security requirements and how it impacts IT security teams.
2015 – Looking Back, Moving Forward
January 6, 2015 by
Bruce Morton
(Entrust)
Apple
Attack
CA/Browser Forum
CAA
Chrome
Code Signing
EV
Firefox
Forward Secrecy
Google
IETF
Malware
Microsoft
MITM
Mozilla
OpenSSL
PKI
Policy
RSA
SHA1
SSL 3.0
SSL/TLS
TLS 1.0
TLS 1.2
TLS 1.3
Vulnerability
Looking Back at 2014 End of 1024-Bit Security In 2014, the SSL industry moved to issuing a minimum security of 2048-bit RSA certificates. Keys smaller than 2048 are no longer allowed in server certificates. In addition, Microsoft and Mozilla started to remove 1024-bit roots from their certificate stores. Hopefully, the key size change will support users through to 2030.
Push to Perfect Forward Secrecy Following the Edward Snowden revelations of pervasive surveillance, there was a big push to configure web servers to support Perfect Forward Secrecy.
Perfect Forward Secrecy
April 11, 2014 by
Bruce Morton
(Entrust),
Rick Andrews
3DES
DH
ECC
ECDH
Forward Secrecy
OpenSSL
RC4
RSA
SSL/TLS
TLS 1.2
Recent revelations from Edward Snowden about pervasive government surveillance have led to many questions about the safety of communications using the SSL/TLS protocol. Such communications are generally safe from eavesdroppers, as long as certain precautions are observed. For example, configuring your web server to avoid using SSL2 and SSL3, favoring newer versions of TLS like TLS 1.2, selecting strong ciphersuites, etc.
But even if your server is configured properly, you still must secure the private key associated with your SSL certificate.
2014 – Looking Back, Moving Forward
January 6, 2014 by
Bruce Morton
(Entrust)
Attack
BEAST
CA/Browser Forum
CAA
Code Signing
ECC
Encryption
Forward Secrecy
HSTS
ICANN
IETF
Microsoft
MITM
Mozilla
PKI
Policy
RC4
RSA
SHA1
SSL/TLS
TLS 1.2
Looking Back at 2013 Protocol Attacks The year started with a couple of SSL/TLS protocol attacks: Lucky Thirteen and RC4 attack. Lucky Thirteen allows the decryption of sensitive information, such as passwords and cookies, when using the CBC-mode cipher suite. Lucky Thirteen can be mitigated by implementing software patches or preferring the cipher suite RC4.
That being said, RC4 was also attacked, where through 16 million sessions a small amount of plaintext can be recovered.
It’s Time for TLS 1.2
September 19, 2013 by
Wayne Thayer
Attack
BEAST
Chrome
Firefox
OCSP
RC4
SHA2
SSL 3.0
SSL/TLS
TLS 1.0
TLS 1.1
TLS 1.2
Vulnerability
In a previous post titled Getting the Most Out of SSL Part 2, we touched on the recommendation that Web servers be configured to prefer Transport Layer Security (TLS) version 1.2. With the planned release of Firefox 24 and recent release of Chrome 29 adding support for TLS 1.2, now is a great time for website administrators to make the switch.
Transport Layer Security was formerly called Secure Sockets Layer (SSL) and is the protocol that enables secure “https://” connections to websites.
Getting the Most Out of SSL Part 2: Configuration
June 29, 2013 by
Ryan Hurst
Attack
CASC
DH
Forward Secrecy
OpenSSL
PKI
RC4
RSA
SSL/TLS
TLS 1.0
TLS 1.2
Vulnerability
They say the most complicated skill is to be simple; despite SSL and HTTPS having been around for a long time, they still are not as simple as they could be.
One of the reasons for this is that the security industry is constantly learning more about how to design and build secure systems; as a result, the protocols and software used to secure online services need to continuously evolve to keep up with the latest risks.
RSA Recap – Securing Your Site
March 8, 2013 by
Ben Wilson
BEAST
CASC
Encryption
Firefox
Hash Function
HSTS
OpenSSL
Policy
RSA
SSL/TLS
TLS 1.1
TLS 1.2
Vulnerability
At RSA last week a few of us participated in panel discussions that focused on SSL/TLS. During the panel that I moderated on Friday, one theme we addressed was secure server configuration. One of CASC’s goals is to help harden existing SSL/TLS implementations against vulnerabilities—because most SSL/TLS exploits arise from suboptimal website configurations. These vulnerabilities and attacks can be mitigated or even eliminated with proper server configuration and good website design.