PKI Consortium blog

Posts by tag Google

    Certificate Transparency Deadline Moved to April 2018
    May 3, 2017 by Bruce Morton (Entrust) Chrome Google IETF Policy SSL/TLS

    Google just announced they will not be enforcing certificate transparency (CT) logging for all new TLS certificates until April 2018. In a previous blog post, we advised that Google provided a new policy, which required new TLS certificates to be published to the CT logs in order for the domain to be trusted by Chrome.

    The reason for the delay was not clear, but Google needs to consider the following:

    • Overall CT policy discussions with the major stakeholders are underway, but we are still far away from a conclusion.
    • Other browsers appear to be supporting CT, but have yet to determine their policies or advance their browser code.
    • The CT deployment document, RFC 6962-bis, tracked by IETF standards has not been released.
    • The proposed document for CT Domain Label Redaction that addresses privacy has started, but has not been adopted or completed by the IETF.
    • Sufficient, scalable, and reliable CT logs have not been deployed by the ecosystem to address the increase in requirements.

    Certification authorities (CAs) as well as TLS certificate subscribers will welcome the extra time to help ensure that deployment of CT logging is efficient and seamless.

    2017 – Looking Back, Moving Forward
    January 13, 2017 by Bruce Morton (Entrust) 3DES Apple Attack CA/Browser Forum CAA Chrome Code Signing Encryption Firefox Google Identity Malware MITM Policy Revocation RSA SSL 3.0 SSL/TLS TLS 1.3 TSA Vulnerability

    Looking Back at 2016

    Fortunately, 2016 was not a year full of SSL/TLS vulnerabilities. Although some researchers did prove old cryptography algorithms should be put out to pasture. The year showed the end of public-trusted SHA-1 SSL/TLS certificates. It also showed more transparency should be considered due to issues discovered with a few certification authorities (CAs). The great news is HTTPS is no longer the minority — after 20 years, connections using HTTPS has surpassed HTTP.

    The Web Is Moving From HTTP to HTTPS
    November 21, 2016 by Dean Coclin Chrome Encryption Google SSL/TLS

    The four letters, “http”, are known to technical and non-technical users alike as the beginning of any web address. These have been ubiquitous for many years. But things are about to change. Pretty soon, you won’t be able to go to many popular websites just by using those 4 letters. You will need to add an “s” at the end (https). Why is this happening? What are the reasons for this change?

    Google Certificate Transparency (CT) to Expand to All Certificates Types
    November 8, 2016 by Jeremy Rowley Announcement CA/Browser Forum Chrome DV EV Google IETF OV Policy SSL/TLS

    The policy change goes into effect October 2017

    A recent Google announcement stated that all publicly trusted SSL/TLS certificates issued in October 2017 or later will be expected to comply with Chrome’s Certificate Transparency (CT) policy or be untrusted by the browser.

    HTTP/2 Update
    October 26, 2016 by Wayne Thayer Google SSL/TLS

    I wrote about the next version of the HTTP protocol 18 months ago. Since then, HTTP/2 has gained significant traction, but not without generating some controversy along the way.

    Performance

    Perhaps the biggest question lingering over HTTP/2 relates to real-world performance benefits. A demonstration comparing the time it takes to load a website over HTTP/1.1 without SSL/TLS versus HTTP/2 (which only works in browsers over HTTPS) has been criticized for being unrealistic. It loads 360 unique images, a scenario that highlights the strengths of HTTP/2’s new design. The criticism comes from the fact that the average web page only loads around 100 objects (images, style sheets, etc.), and is often optimized for HTTP/1.1 using techniques that reduce the effectiveness of the HTTP/2 mechanisms.

    Always-On SSL
    September 30, 2016 by Rick Andrews, Ben Wilson Encryption Firefox Google Identity Microsoft Mixed Content OpenSSL Policy Qualified SSL/TLS

    There is no doubt that content owners and publishers have a duty to encourage trust and the confidence during internet usage by adopting security best practices. If a customer believes that their data and identity are safe and protected, they are more inclined to continue their online transactions. Industry best practices for website protection should be vendor-neutral, easy to implement, and globally accessible. Websites should take all the reasonable steps possible to adopt best practices in secure design and implementation, and this includes using Always-On SSL across the entire website.

    Chrome to Show HTTP Sites as Not Secure
    September 15, 2016 by Bruce Morton (Entrust) Chrome Google HSTS SSL/TLS Vulnerability

    Always-On SSL should be deployed to prevent the “Not secure” warning

    Website owners who do not secure their website with an SSL/TLS certificate will have to rethink their online strategy.  In a push to make the Internet safer for all users, Google will soon be issuing a stronger warning to visitors who navigate to a website that does not have the protection of an SSL/TLS certificate.

    Trust Indication Change in Google Chrome
    August 24, 2016 by Bruce Morton (Entrust) Chrome EV Google ISO SSL/TLS

    Google is making security icon changes in the Chrome status bar. The changes are based on a research paper prepared by members of Google and University of California, Berkeley. The research evaluated forty icons, seven complementary strings and surveyed 1,329 people.

    The goal is to make it easier for browser users to determine how secure their connection to a site is and indicate if the site is dangerous or deceptive. In addition, the icons are to indicate to people that HTTP is less secure than HTTPS. Below are representations of the old icons and the selected new icons which are to be used in Chrome.

    Moving to Always on HTTPS, Part 1 of 2; Marking HTTP as Unsecure
    February 3, 2016 by Ben Wilson Chrome Firefox Google HSTS Malware Mixed Content Mozilla SSL/TLS Vulnerability

    Over the past several years there has been increased discussion about deprecating HTTP and making HTTPS the default protocol for the World Wide Web.  (HTTP stands for “HyperText Transfer Protocol” and the “S” in HTTPS is enabled with an SSL/TLS digital certificate properly installed and configured on a web server.)  These discussions have taken place in the context of browser security indications and technical improvements simplifying the global movement to “Always on HTTPS.”   Part 1 of this two-part blog post will address browser security indicators, while Part 2 discusses technical developments to make HTTPS the default protocol when browsing the web.

    What Will Happen With SHA-1 and Browser Users on January 1st, 2016?
    January 5, 2016 by Bruce Morton (Entrust) Android Apple Chrome Firefox Google Mozilla SSL/TLS Vulnerability

    On January 1, 2016, the public trust certification authorities (CAs) will stop issuing SHA-1 signed SSL/TLS certificates. What will happen?

    Will all websites using SHA-1 fail? No. SHA-1 will be supported by browsers and operating systems through 2016. Microsoft and Mozilla have announced that Windows and Firefox will not support SHA-1 in 2017, but no change for 2016. We expect Apple to follow the same protocol.

    What about Chrome? Chrome will still provide warning indications in the browser status bar for SHA-1 signed certificates which expire in 2016 and in 2017 or later. No change.

    Participate in our community discussions and/or join the consortium